Several years ago reports began to surface about two extraordinary incidents.
They became known as the M6 Paranormal Crash and the Paris Paranormal Crash and these reports spread throughout the world; there was even a video released claiming to be from the scene of the M6 crash.
The video can be viewed here:
I was intrigued by how these reports spread across the world so carried out my own investigation and released a book chronicling my findings called Fact or Fiction.
During y investigations I managed to track down someone who claimed to be in the car that captured the video from the crash, here’s a short clip from that interview I conducted a few years ago:
Then things went quiet.
That is until a recent book called 1 of 26 surfaced claiming to be about these reports and also detailing other so-called ‘facts’ surrounding the incidents. The writer claimed it would reveal ‘the real story behind the headlines’. It was written by an unknown author going by the name ZWT Jameson. I say that he goes by that name as nothing ever seems to be clear cut about the story. After various online exchanges he agreed to an interview.
This is the interview I conducted with ZWT Jameson via Twitter. The conditions were that everything was conducted via the platform and via DM. We have not met face to face, and obviously with social distancing and travel restrictions in place, this format was the best way to connect with ZWT and conduct the interview.
This is what he had to say.
Q:
Firstly thank you for agreeing to the interview, and perhaps the first question should be that given some of the subject matter in the book, isn’t there a touch of opportunism attached to the release date of your book?
ZW:
Not at all, the original draft was ready about 2 years ago, I just spent time working on the edit
Q:
So I think the the next question that comes to mind is the tag line, it’s being touted as ‘the real story behind the headlines’ – can you explain this please?
ZW:
It’s exactly that, the real story that goes some way to explain the original headlines surrounding the reports into the ‘M6 Paranormal Crash’ and the ‘Paris Paranormal Crash’
Q:
So that suggests that the book has been researched and you have interviewed people to authenticate these headlines – is that correct?
ZW:
Yes.
Q:
So if that’s the case why has it been released as a science-fiction thriller and not released as non-fiction? If, as you say you have, interviewed people about the subject matter in the book, then surely it’s non-fiction?
ZW:
I had to be very careful because each interview was carried out in confidence and via online channels so whilst I can say this is the real story, I cannot independently verify that any of what I’ve been told during those interviews is true.
Q:
By that you mean the elements of time travel and also issues surrounding the two incidents that allegedly occurred on the M6 and in Paris?
ZW:
Yes
Q:
I mentioned earlier on about the timing of the release and a touch of opportunism attached to it, this directly relates to the fact that in the book you, or should I say one of your characters, talks about a virus that spreads and develops into a pandemic and that the only way to create a vaccine to halt its spread is to travel back to our time to gather ingredients to manufacture this – how comfortable are you about publishing this sort of narrative given the times we currently live in?
ZW:
The first draft was ready about 2 years ago so that makes me totally comfortable, but also as you will have read, there are many different narrative strands to the book and the virus is just one component, so to suggest this book is all about a virus isn’t accurate
Q:
Ok – but this is a central plot point
ZW:
Along with time travel, alleged government diversionary tactics, corporate insider trading, tyrannical rule, the conditioning of a society, and allegations surrounding first contact to name a few
Q:
Ok – on First Contact, one of the points raised in the book, and I presume from one of your interviews, is that this allegedly occurred in 2009 and evidence of this is stored on the International Space Station – do you believe this to be the case?
ZW:
I can only relay what I was told in the interviews. The person who gave that interview went by the name of Steve Garner, not his real name, but he went into great detail about what he was told concerning the cover up. Another interviewee went into detail about a preceding incident that centred on one of Jupiter’s moons, Ganymede and how the alleged contact was covered up due to concerns if the real facts about that leaked out into the public domain.
Q:
And you feel these testimonies are believable?
ZW:
I can only take it on face value which is why I listed the book as science-fiction
Q:
So is this book predominantly about witness testimony or your own supposition?
ZW:
Probably a bit of both. I had to make it read like a book so took the interviews and pieced them together into my own narrative.
Q:
Did you in any way take those interviews and exaggerate them to skew this book towards your own narrative agenda?
ZW:
No. As best as I could I took them on face value and stitched them together so they made sense.
Q:
The book seems almost prophetic when you go into subject matter like the virus and also when it discusses the whole scenario regarding the downfall of authority based on the rollout of something you called a Carbon Quota System – something you suggest will be used to manage people’s carbon footprint – did you feel at any time during the writing process that this was the case?
ZW:
It’s hard to respond to that question because when the first draft was finished about 2 years ago we were in a far different place to where we are now. But when I look back and compare the world to the place we are currently living in, yes, I suppose it does have a certain foreboding feel to it.
Q:
Did you have that foreboding feeling during those interviews?
ZW:
Not really, as far as I was concerned I was researching for a book and nothing else crossed my mind
Q:
But this is also a book that talks about time travel and the research of Ronald Mallett – a man who is famed for his theories on the subject – did that at least make it feel real?
ZW:
If you’re asking me if I think time travel is possible, then the answer is yes, but in the context of the interviews for the book I wasn’t sure that anything imparted to me during those interviews constituted adequate proof
Q:
So would you consider your position as someone who was a skeptic during those interviews?
ZW:
I was always open minded given the source material. If I was to come across as a skeptic and to take a defensive position that wouldn’t have worked. I knew that I had to instil confidence in the interviewees to ensure they would be as open as was possible during that process.
Q:
And was there any point at all during this process where you felt that you were going to call time and walk away?
ZW:
No
Q:
Did that open minded attitude colour the final version of the book?
ZW:
No
Q:
So how would you feel if someone called it out as a hoax?
ZW:
The book is labelled as science-fiction so I have no issue with that – books are meant to stimulate debate and if that is where the debate winds up I wouldn’t be concerned as everyone is entitled to their opinion
Q:
And what about the people you interviewed – what do you think their reaction would be?
ZW:
I can’t speak for them but they knew what they were getting into when they agreed to the interviews.
Q:
Have they read the final version of the book?
ZW:
Yes
Q:
Are you able to divulge any reactions they had to it?
ZW:
They didn’t say anything negative about it, so I guess they must be happy with the final draft
Q:
I read a resent piece published by Larry Hobson (this man claims to represent ZWT Jameson) that connected a specific weapon in the book to a CIA weapons development programme carried out at Area 51 – can you elaborate on this?
ZW:
Larry and I spoke about this weapon, the DNA gun, and how this was brought up in one of the interviews I conducted for the book and he felt it made for an interesting article
Q:
So are you comfortable with the allegations made in the piece that suggest the CIA had access to alien tech stored at Area 51 to develop this and maybe other weapons?
ZW:
Absolutely. The source material was based on the interview, the suggestion was made so yes, I’m comfortable with it
Q:
And for the readers, can you explain how this weapon works?
ZW:
Put very simply, and I think Larry made the same point, the weapon discharges rounds that track the intended victim using their DNA. It’s a short range weapon
Q:
I think the point was made in the piece is that in effect the DNA gun discharges rounds that have their victims name on it – is this correct?
ZW:
Yes. But I think there are far wider concerns and this was touched on in the article written by Larry
Q:
Such as?
ZW:
Primarily the issue of privacy and who would have access to the various DNA databases across the world – this was touched on during the interview I conducted. The person who spoke of this was deeply concerned that such a weapon could easily be abused in the hands of people who sought to exploit it should they wish to raid these databases and use them unscrupulously
Q:
But isn’t that the case with any weapon?
ZW:
It is, but the way the DNA gun works separates it from other weapons because of the method it uses to target its victim. How that DNA information would have to be accessed to make it functional is certainly an issue not be be taken lightly, and in the wrong hands such information could be lethal. DNA is collected for many different reasons by many different organisations, this could open up serious privacy issues about the usage of this information.
Q:
So do you think there’s a moral obligation on behalf of the organisations that store DNA or on the authorities that may have access to this weapon?
ZW:
I think both
Q:
You say on the cover this is part 1 – are you saying there’s more to come?
ZW:
I have a lot more research to do on what I was told during those interviews, so yes I will be working on the next part
Q:
Any timescales on when people can expect that?
ZW:
When the research is finished then I can start to work on it so it will take time.
Q:
Are you able to divulge any details?
ZW:
The Bermuda Triangle
Q:
And that’s it?
ZW:
I was told of an incident that took place in the Bermuda Triangle but I’m still researching this as it is highly sensitive
Q:
Tell me this, how do you go about researching something that took place in the Bermuda Triangle?
ZW:
There are ways but I cannot say anything as that could jeopardise my sources
Q:
So just to be clear, you’re saying one of your interviews covered an incident in the Bermuda Triangle and that this is highly sensitive but it will be in the next part of this story – is that correct?
ZW:
Yes
Q:
Are you working on anything else that be of interest to readers of this interview?
ZW:
I’m also part of the creative team behind ARES, a science-fiction movie currently in development with Warner Brothers.
Q:
So you have a particular thing about science-fiction?
ZW:
Yes
Special thanks to ZWT Jameson for taking the time out to participate in this interview and if you have wish to investigate his work further you can find more information at:
